Scoring Standards

Candle Scoring Standards

Last updated: 2026-08-30 00:00:00 +0000 UTC

Candle Scoring Dimensions

Nearly 48% of complaints for the candle category are fragrance-related, and 28% involve poor burning performance, so the weight for avoiding common defects is set the highest, followed by the durability weight representing long-term use reliability. Consumers focus on specific features such as fragrance and burning effect when purchasing, so the authentic praise weight is moderate, and the recommend rate weight is the lowest, which conforms to the actual decision-making priority of users in this category.

Weight Distribution

Dimension Weight What It Means
Complaint Avoidance 40% Lower complaint rate โ†’ higher score
Authentic Praise 20% More specific praise โ†’ higher score
Durability 25% Better long-term reliability โ†’ higher score
Would Recommend 15% Higher “would buy again” rate โ†’ higher score

Bonus Keywords (+3 points each)

Reviews mentioning these features get a score boost:

  • long burn time
  • pleasant fragrance
  • realistic flicker
  • true to description

Penalty Keywords (-5 points each)

Reviews mentioning these issues get a score penalty:

  • damaged delivery
  • weak fragrance
  • uneven burn
  • not as described
  • irritating scent

How to Use This

When evaluating candle products, prioritize products with:

  1. Low complaint rates in the top pain point categories
  2. High authentic praise rates (specific, not generic)
  3. Strong durability signals from long-term users
  4. Positive mentions of: long burn time, pleasant fragrance, realistic flicker
  5. No mentions of: damaged delivery, weak fragrance, uneven burn

โ† Back to Scoring Standards

โš ๏ธ Scores are derived from AI analysis of verified Amazon customer reviews, not physical testing. See full methodology .